Almost all of my clients have what I call a "committee" -- a collection of well-meaning friends, relatives, neighbors, etc., all of whom want to offer divorce advice. It is not unusual for me to spend hours with a client (at $600 per hour) carefully outlining his/her options, answering their questions, and recommending a carefully thought-out course of action based on 24 years of experience, only to have them call me the following day to say, "my cousin Fred/my college roommate Sue/another mother at my kids' school/a guy I see at the gym got divorced last year and THEY think . . ." Aaaagghh!! My invariable response -- delivered in as innocent and deadpan a manner as I can muster -- is: "Oh, is he/she a divorce lawyer in New York? No? A divorce lawyer ANYwhere? No? Well, how about a lawyer of ANY kind? No? Uh-huh . . . so, um, why would I -- or you -- be interested in their legal opinion on this issue?" Sigh.
Seriously, just because Sue/Fred/the other mom at school/the guy at the gym got divorced doesn't mean that their respective experiences in the court system have any relevance to yours. It's not that you shouldn't seek emotional and social support from your "committee" -- by all means, avail yourself of their friendship -- but take any legal advice they start dishing out with a grain of salt.
There is another stock character in many divorce scenarios, a character that one of my former partners termed a "coat holder." The "coat holder" is typically another professional -- the client's shrink, or stockbroker, or accountant. That professional riles the client up by proffering gung-ho advice along the lines of "you need to say blahblahblah, and you tell your lawyer that he/she needs to go into court and take the offensive and tell the judge blahblahblah." Typically, the client has not really told this other professional the full story, so the cheerleading-type advice they give out so readily is usually based upon a false premise. And keep in mind that often times the only legal knowledge these other professionals have is derived from a devoted viewing of Law & Order. But why did my partner refer to them as "coat holders?" It's because he likened them to a situation where you're in a bar with a friend, and a Hell's Angel sitting a few barstools away is drunk and belligerent and tossing around insults. Your friend then urges you to punch the guy even though the odds are you'll end up beaten to a pulp: "You shouldn't put up with that! Go on, you can take him! Teach him a lesson! I'll hold your coat." LOL! The point is, these mis-informed professionals are all keen to urge the clients to an aggressive, rash course of action without having any appreciation for the risks involved, and without bearing any responsibility for the consequences that flow therefrom. I usually tell my client in these situations: "Tell Dr. Smith/your broker/your accountant that I won't perform psychotherapy/sell securities/prepare tax returns, if he/she stops trying to practice law."

One of the sub-editors I worked with when I was a very junior reporter, used to call that sort of person a 'barrack-room lawyer' - dating back I think to his wartime days when there was always one person who was the 'expert' on everything despite having no qualifications whatsoever.
You get them in all walks of life - it's just that some can do more damage than others!
Posted by: Liz F | December 02, 2010 at 06:00 AM
Hi LizF: LOL! I've heard that phrase before -- very apt indeed!
Posted by: Karen | December 02, 2010 at 08:00 AM
I could have written this myself. Obviously New York or Paris, people act in the same way.
Posted by: charlottejuliet | December 02, 2010 at 02:17 PM
OMG How many times did a well meaning friend say to me, "tell your lawywer to tell his lawyer that you will not stand for blah, blah, blah." When a close freind and her husband had a family fall out which necessitated hiring a lawyer she finally understood how all the "good advice" that she was receiving was a total waste of time. In fact, it became a greater burden.
Posted by: Martha Snow | December 02, 2010 at 05:24 PM
Hello Charlotte Juliet: I guess human nature is human nature all the world over! Thanks for commenting.
Hi Martha: You've really hit the nail on the head -- all of the well-intentioned but misguided advice from friends ends up creating more stress for the client, who is being bombarded from all sides. The best thing a friend can do, in my opinion? Take your divorcing friend for a cup of coffee and LISTEN, don't give advice; go to the movies with them; go for a walk; invite them out to dinner. In short, give them a much-needed BREAK and remind them that there's still a life outside lawyers' offices and the grimy courthouse.
Posted by: Karen | December 02, 2010 at 05:58 PM
A lot of my defence lawyer friends tell me that they lose their minds when they meet with a client and plan out their strategy, only to have the client go back to jail and talk to all his buddies on the range. These people always dispense all sorts of legal advice which is contrary to what the lawyer has just said. I guess that would be the "jail committee!" Obviously the knowledge of these "committee members' has not served them too well, as they are living behind bars, yet it never ceases to amaze me how everyone wants to pretend to be the lawyer. Do these people go to their doctor and suggest what sort of diagnostic tests should be ordered? I would think they'd be shown the door pretty quickly!
Jacqueline
Posted by: Jacqueline | December 02, 2010 at 09:47 PM
I CANT WAIT UNTIL THESE TALES BECOME A BOOK! TOO FUNNY -- and so TRUE!
Posted by: Madame B. | December 03, 2010 at 12:32 AM
Hi Jacqueline: That's so funny; sure, why not follow the advice of the felon in the bunk above yours (doing 8-12 on a grand larceny conviction) rather than the advice of counsel. LOL! Thanks for stopping by and commenting.
Hello Madame B: Well, from your lips to God's ears -- it's impossible to get an agent, much less a publisher, but at least I can share my, er . . . wisdom (?) here. Thanks for checking in. See you soon!
Posted by: Karen | December 03, 2010 at 08:37 AM